View Full Essay Words:
Many people supported the government's decision, but others did not. As the war dragged on, opposition became more prevalent as support declined. Watch the video titled The press After the first announcement there was general support from the news outlets for the government's policy.
It was not, however, the type of support that had greeted previous Australian involvement in wars. There was little mention of words like 'heroic' and more mention of words like 'grave decision' and 'inevitable'.
There was no jingoistic, patriotic flag-waving. Many of the papers simply said Australia had no alternative, given its geographical position and its treaty commitments. The support was there, but it was muted and it tended to question the political situation in South Vietnam. The majority of newspapers also supported the Labor Party's Arthur Calwell when he made a very eloquent anti-war speech in Parliament, but they then criticised the Labor opposition for having no alternative to the government's policy.
See image 1 Only the Australian newspaper, owned by Rupert Murdoch, criticised the decision outright. Its editorial described the move as 'reckless' and 'wrong' and said it showed contempt by Prime Minister Menzies for the people of Australia and their opinions on the war.
That support was less vociferous in the Senate than in the lower House. Unlike the Labor Party, there were no ideological splits in the Liberal Party, so they were able to present a united front. When Menzies retired in and Harold Holt took over the leadership, the party rallied behind him.
Holt brought Australia into an even closer relationship with America. In after a visit to Washington, where Holt was given a very friendly welcome by Johnson, he enthusiastically declared that when it came to Vietnam, Australia was 'All the way with LBJ'.
It was also determined to oppose any ALP policies - so it automatically supported the war.
There was widespread support for the government of the Republic of Vietnam, even after the assassination of the Catholic leader Ngo Dinh Diem.
Many Australian Catholics, however, did not see the Pope's announcement as any reason not to support the commitment of troops to South Vietnam. See animation There was some Liberal Catholic opposition to the war which grew over the years, but in the majority of outspoken Catholic opinion was firmly behind Menzies, America and the Republic of Vietnam.
The election had primarily been fought over educational issues, but the issue of Vietnam also played a large part in the outcome. Apart from the reaction at the election polls, opinion polls also showed widespread support among the people for the government decision to go to war.
The same poll also showed there was widespread belief in the domino effect theory and that it was a popular reason for sending troops into Vietnam.The number of refugees worldwide has expanded dramatically in the first decades of the twenty-first century, with tens of millions of people forced to seek shelter outside their countries of origin.
Online Shop Use this login for Shop items, and image, film, sound reproductions. The following resources have been listed for students studying Attitudes to the Vietnam War for Unit 4, VCE Australian History.
This list can also be viewed on page of the History Study Design. GET THIS PAPER at ashio-midori.com How Did Various Groups Respond to Australia’s Involvement in the Vietnam War?
In Australia decided to send combat forces to help the government of South Vietnam in the struggle against communist activities from the North.
We will write a custom essay sample on How Did Various Groups Respond to Australia’s Involvement in the Vietnam War? specifically for . Feb 26, · Keep this essay to hand and send it to people who ask you as to why you do not share the “consensus” on global warming.
The pdf doesn’t say anything we haven’t heard before but it does put the various arguments in context. Yet as I was not a antiwar Vietnam Vet.
and due to the fact I was a rather dark skinned person.